Media Consolidation and Indecency -- the Link January 23, 2006 Creative Voices's study, "Ownership Concentration and Indecency in Broadcasting: Is There a Link?" finds that from 2000 to 2003, four of the nation's largest radio companies were responsible for 96% of FCC indecency fines, while their stations accounted for only about half of the country's listening audience. The study points out that some of the politicians who are now trying to crack down on indecency by raising fines on broadcasters are the same ones who voted in 1996 to relax ownership rules that contributed to concentration. The report concludes that, "One of the unintended consequences of their support of deregulation is an increase in indecency." Rather than increase fines for indecency, the report suggests that a more effective and First Amendment-friendly approach to the indecency problem would be to reintroduce meaningful station ownership caps, limit vertical integration of program ownership, and promoting localism and diversity of voices in our nation’s media. FOR A COPY OF THE REPORT, CLICK BELOW TO HEAR AUDIO OF THE SPEAKERS AT THE REPORT'S RELEASE at the National Press Club, click here. Related Link Copps Lauds CV's Media Indecency Report

Printer-Friendly

Related Articles •Bringing "Biblical Principles" to the FCC (August 8, 2005) •Extend Broadcast Indecency Regs to Cable and Satellite? There's a Far Better Way (March 1, 2005) •'Private Ryan’ and Public Censorship (November 20, 2004) •FCC Indecency Rules Stifling Quality Programming, Must be Reconsidered (May 13, 2004) •Does Media Concentration Cause Indecency? (May 10, 2004) •Chill Media Consolidation To Fight Indecency, Not Free Expression (April 12, 2004)